From blockchain voting experiments to Donald Trump's multiple "Trump Trading Card" NFT drops, Web3 is making some controversial waves in the political arena. How could it be otherwise? It’s politics, after all.

Seeing as how elections are on everyone's mind, we can use government models as an analogy to better understand what is the blockchain trilemma. The trilemma refers to challenges in balancing blockchain's three fundamental characteristics: security, decentralization, and scalability. 

The "trilemma" arises because it is hard to optimize for one aspect without compromising the others. Kind of like the carnival game whack-a-mole: if you nail one, the other two pop up. This slide from Builder Oden shows the tradeoff. 

A fascinating aspect of blockchain is how it mirrors some aspects of society. For example, just like in blockchain, governance systems involve balancing efficiency (scalability), fairness (decentralization), and security. Here's what I mean:

1. Authoritarian Regime (Scalable, Secure, Less Decentralized):

2. An authoritarian regime can make swift decisions and maintain tight control, ensuring security. However, it lacks decentralization as power is concentrated in the hands of a few.
   

3. Direct Democracy (Decentralized, Less Scalable, Secure):

4. Direct democracy allows for widespread participation and fair representation. Still, it can be slow and less efficient in decision-making due to the need for broad consensus.
   

5. Representative Democracy (Balanced Approach):

6. A representative democracy tries to balance the three aspects by electing representatives to make decisions on behalf of the people, ensuring some level of decentralization, security, and efficiency. However, it still involves tradeoffs, and the balance can shift depending on the system's design and implementation.

What is the Blockchain Trilemma Tradeoff? 

As we've seen, just like in governance systems, the blockchain trilemma involves balancing efficiency (scalability), fairness (decentralization), and security.

As blockchain evolves, some people have been asking “What is one method of solving the blockchain trilemma?” While Ethereum’s historic 2022 upgrade in to Proof of Stake was a big step in balancing the trilemma, there still isn’t really one silver bullet solution, because different clients have different needs.

Variations in blockchain—public, private, permissioned, consortium, hybrid, and sidechains—represent attempts to find the right balance among these three critical aspects, similar to how different forms of government strive to balance efficiency, fairness, and security.

For example, many enterprise clients are understandably concerned with security. What happens when an organization optimizes for security in a blockchain network?

Centralization and scalability both decrease. The detail below explains why.

Impact of Optimizing Blockchain for Security:

Reduction in Decentralization:

• Controlled Participation: To enhance security, an organization might restrict access to only trusted participants. This reduces the number of nodes and, thus, the level of decentralization.

• Centralized Governance: Enhanced security often involves centralized control or governance to ensure strict security protocols, which inherently limits the network's decentralization.

• Reduced Anonymity: Increased security measures may require detailed KYC (Know Your Customer) and AML (Anti-Money Laundering) procedures, reducing the anonymity and openness that characterize highly decentralized networks.

Why This Happens:

• Ease of Monitoring Helps Security: Fewer, more controlled participants are easier to monitor and manage, reducing the risk of malicious actors infiltrating the network.

• Enhanced Trust: Centralized governance can enforce stringent security policies and updates, maintaining a higher level of trust and reliability within the network.

Reduction in Scalability:

• Complex Consensus Mechanisms: High-security protocols often use complex and time-consuming mechanisms (like Proof of Work) to validate transactions, which can slow down the transaction processing rate.

• Resource Intensive: Security-focused networks may require more computational power and resources to maintain, which can limit the number of transactions processed per second.

• Thorough Validation: To ensure security, transactions may undergo more rigorous validation and verification processes, further slowing down the network.

Why This Happens:

• Comprehensive Verification: Secure networks prioritize thorough verification to prevent fraud and attacks, which takes more time and computational resources.

• Resource Allocation: High-security measures often require significant computational power, which can limit scalability as resources are finite.

Variations on a Theme: Different Types of Blockchains

Variations on the Bitcoin blockchain model arose because different use cases require different trilemma tradeoffs.  Knowing that the trilemma tradeoff is at the root of blockchain variations helps you understand why the different blockchain types make sense and can help teams choose the right solution for specific applications. 

Below is an overview of some blockchain variations based on how they balance the Trilemma Tradeoff. I've extended the governance analogy; results vary, but I get points for trying, no?

Grass Roots and Granola - Public Blockchains 

Definition: Public blockchains are decentralized and open to anyone. They allow anyone to participate in the network by running a node, validating transactions, or simply using the network to transfer assets or information.

Key Features:

• Decentralization: High. No single entity controls the network.

• Transparency: All transactions are visible to everyone on the network.

• Security: High security through consensus protocols like Proof of Work (PoW) or Proof of Stake (PoS).

• Examples: Bitcoin, Ethereum.

Use Cases:

• Cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin and other digital currencies.

• Decentralized Applications (dApps): Various applications on the Ethereum network.

• Smart Contracts: Automated, self-executing contracts on public blockchains.

Keys to the Castle - Private Blockchains 

Definition: Private blockchains are restricted and controlled by a single organization. Participation is limited to authorized users who have been granted access.

Key Features:

• Decentralization: Low. Controlled by a single entity.

• Restricted Access: Only authorized participants can join the network.

• Privacy: Transactions and data are visible only to the participants.

• Examples: Hyperledger Fabric operated by individual organizations.

Use Cases:

• Internal Business Processes: Streamlining and securing internal operations.

• Supply Chain Management: Monitoring and managing supply chains within a company.

• Financial Services: Secure and private financial transactions within an organization.

Private Clubs - Permissioned Blockchains 

Definition: Permissioned blockchains are hybrids that fall between public and private blockchains. They require participants to have permission to join and often have a governance structure that defines who can participate and what activities they can perform.

Key Features:

• Controlled Participation: Only authorized users can access the network.

• Governance: A governance structure defines roles and permissions.

• Security: Enhanced security due to controlled access.

• Examples: Hyperledger Fabric, R3 Corda.

Use Cases:

• Consortium Blockchains: These are used by groups of organizations to collaborate on shared goals.

• Regulatory Compliance: Ensuring compliance with regulations by controlling access and participation.

• Industry-Specific Solutions: Tailored solutions for finance, healthcare, and supply chain industries.

State's Rights - Consortium Blockchains 

Definition: Consortium blockchains are a subset of Permissioned blockchains controlled by a group of organizations rather than a single entity. Also known as federated blockchains, they provide a middle ground between fully decentralized public blockchains and fully centralized private blockchains.

Key Features:

• Shared Control: Managed by a group of organizations.

• Permissioned Access: Only authorized participants can join and participate.

• Collaboration: Facilitates collaboration between organizations with common interests.

• Examples: R3 Corda, Energy Web Foundation.

Use Cases:

• Banking and Finance: Collaboration between banks for secure and efficient transactions.

• Supply Chain: Multiple companies in a supply chain share data and processes. Walmart's supply chain is an example. 

• Healthcare: Secure sharing of patient data among healthcare providers.

Town Halls - Hybrid Blockchains

Definition: Hybrid blockchains combine elements of both public and private blockchains, allowing for controlled access while maintaining some level of public transparency.

Key Features:

• Flexibility: Combining public and private features can be tailored to specific needs.

• Controlled Access: Certain parts of the blockchain are private, while others are public.

• Interoperability: Can interact with other blockchains and traditional systems.

• Examples: Dragonchain, XinFin.

Use Cases:

• Enterprise Solutions: Combining public transparency with private control for businesses.

• Government Services: Publicly accessible records with privately controlled data.

The Suburbs - Sidechains

Definition: Sidechains are separate blockchains that run parallel to a main blockchain, allowing assets to be transferred between them. Developers are working on sidechains to improve scalability, but just as some suburbs are more sketch than others, sidechains introduce risk because they may not be as secure as the main blockchain.

Key Features:

• Interoperability: Assets and data can be transferred between the main and side chains.

• Scalability: Offloading transactions to sidechains can improve the performance of the main chain.

• Customization: Sidechains can have different rules and functionalities.

• Examples: Lightning Network, Rootstock (RSK).

Use Cases:

• Scalability Solutions: Enhancing the performance of main blockchains.

• Experimentation: Testing new features and protocols without risking the main chain.

• Specialized Applications: Tailored solutions for specific use cases.

I hope you've enjoyed today's civics lesson. See you at the polls! 

PS

If you are skimming the article because you are too busy plotting to take over an empire to read the whole thing, here is the summary:

TLDR (too long, didn't read)

The blog post explores how government models can serve as an analogy to understand the Blockchain Trilemma, which involves balancing blockchain security, decentralization, and scalability. 

By drawing parallels with different political systems, such as authoritarian regimes, direct democracies, and representative democracies, the post explains how optimizing one aspect of the trilemma often compromises the others. 

It provides a detailed examination of various blockchain types, including public, private, permissioned, consortium, hybrid, and sidechains, illustrating how each type manages these tradeoffs to meet specific use cases. 

The post highlights the impact of prioritizing security, the challenges of achieving blockchain scalability, and the importance of decentralization, offering a comprehensive guide for business leaders to navigate the complexities of blockchain technology.

FAQs for What is the Blockchain Trilemma?

Blockchain Trilemma and Governance

Q: What is the blockchain trilemma? A: The blockchain trilemma refers to the challenge of simultaneously achieving three key properties in a blockchain network: security, decentralization, and scalability.

Q: How does the blockchain trilemma relate to government models? A: The analogy is that blockchains, like governments, face trade-offs when balancing different priorities. For instance, a highly centralized blockchain (like an authoritarian regime) might prioritize security and scalability but sacrifice decentralization.

Blockchain Types and Trade-offs

Q: What are the different types of blockchains? A: There are several types, including public, private, permissioned, consortium, hybrid, and sidechains. Each has different levels of decentralization, security, and scalability.

Q: Which blockchain type is best? A: The best blockchain type depends on the specific use case. For example, a highly secure financial application might prefer a private blockchain, while a decentralized application might choose a public blockchain.

Q: What are sidechains? A: Sidechains are separate blockchains that run parallel to a main blockchain, allowing for increased scalability and experimentation without affecting the main chain's security.

General Blockchain Questions

Q: Why is it difficult to achieve all three aspects of the blockchain trilemma? A: Optimizing one aspect often comes at the expense of others. For example, increasing security might require centralization, which reduces decentralization. Similarly, enhancing scalability can sometimes compromise security.

Q: How can I learn more about blockchain technology? A: Check out our other posts about Blockchain. You can also check these links, too:
Blockchain trilemma vitalik - The founder of Ethereum’s view on the topic.
Blockchain trilemma solana - information about Solana’s approach to solving the blockchain trilemma.

blockchain trilemma Investopedia this TradFi website for investors has a lot of high quality information about cryptocurrency

Thanks for reading. Please sign up for our newsletter if you haven’t already. If you follow a publication or podcast that you think would be a fit for us, please let them know. Drop us a line so we can reach out, too.